MICHAEL WALSH, HISTORIAN. Before London declared war on the Christian Reich on September 3, 1939, Britain had a vast global empire and powerful Commonwealth allies.
Together, the British Empire was far more formidable than the emerging United States and Soviet Union combined.
It is bizarre that, throughout the war, Winston Churchill never consulted or collaborated with his Australian, South African, New Zealand, Indian or Canadian counterparts.
An Empire far stronger than the US or USSR
These powerful British Empire component nations made up an integral part of the London-based British Empire.
Unlike the neutral United States, these nations had almost immediately declared war on the German Reich. Yet Churchill never involved these partners in consultation as to the direction of the war with Germany.
Omnipotent World Empire
Their geographical diversity; access to raw materials, manufacturing potential, trade connections and distance from Europe suggests that strategically and economically they would make far better partners than the United States.
If engaged, there would be little need for Roosevelt’s Lend-Lease agreements, for which, with interest, the British people would pay back to the United States for generations to come.
Why then did Winston Churchill, with the powers of a dictator and electorally unaccountable go personally cap in hand to the Empire’s only competitor; a country that was not at war with Germany?
Was the British Empire by then an irrelevancy to him?
Was it Churchill’s intention to broker a deal that would dismantle and transfer the British Empire to American power?
If so, he could hardly have been more successful. The unelected wartime leader was half-American with strong family ties to the American-Jewish community.
Churchill an All-American Boy
During his life, Winston Churchill visited, and for at least 16 times he stayed in the United States; Was it Winston’s Churchill’s secret war agenda to simultaneously remove German competition and potential danger from the USSR, which was financed by Wall Street’s bankers?
Churchill a Hero of the Soviet Union
If so, then Winston Churchill, a double agent, achieved far more for the USSR than did Josef Stalin, V. I. Lenin and Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) combined. They could have named Red Square after him.
As Prime Minister, financed by Jewish rings, was he hand in glove with the better-known agents such as Kim Philby and the Soviet Spy Ring?
Churchill Spymaster
One of Winston Churchill’s first acts on becoming Britain’s unelected prime minister in May 1940 was to halt all intelligence surveillance on Soviet suspects.
This led to the wholesale infiltration of MI5 and MI6 by the Kremlin throughout the 1940s. Was it a coincidence that at this time Britain’s head of MI6/SIS in the Iberian Peninsula was the notorious British-Soviet spy, Kim Philby?
Turned an empire into a dustbowl
Everything that Winston Churchill undertook worked to the detriment of Britain and its Empire.
Every strategy Churchill adopted benefited the Soviet Union and the all-powerful Jewish mafia controlling American politics? In Israel, a forest was named in Winston Churchill’s honour.
If it looks like a duck
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is a duck.
The money is on Winston Churchill having succeeded beyond his wildest dreams in transferring a vast empire to other contenders. Between 64 and 71 years of age, that one man destroyed an empire so great the sun never set on it.
Stalin’s Saviour
In doing so, he created an all-powerful United States; he consolidated and extended the powers of the Soviet Union.
He reduced the Christian Reich to rubble. The only system that could challenge the British Empire, the Soviet Union and the United States as superpowers.
He was the only man with the power to bring down an empire. Was it an unfortunate coincidence that he presided over the dismantling of the British Empire and the transfer of its assets to the United States of America and the Soviet Union?
No Regrets over a Collapsed Empire
This may go some way to explain why Churchill expressed no regrets over the carnage of World War II. Why would he regret having so successfully accomplished all he had set out to achieve?
Such was the appalling misery heaped upon mankind that it would have been perfectly natural for any government leader, regardless of political persuasion, to express remorse.
ADOLF HITLER: MY LAST TESTAMENT. LET GOD JUDGE ME. Mike Walsh. Forbidden History: First published. Click the picture for information.
Christianity Crucified
Adolf Hitler and the leading figures of the Christian Reich, along with other Axis figures, constantly lamented the immense suffering caused by Churchill’s war
On the other hand, Josef Stalin, Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt never lamented the loss of 50 million lives and the transfer of over 20 nations to the triumphant Soviet Union.
WITNESS TO HISTORY. MIKE WALSH. If a book is worth banning, it is worth buying. From 1934, the British, Soviet, and American empires provoked war with trade rival Germany. Click the picture to discover more.
How strange an oversight
If Winston Churchill was a super-agent, the most successful in world history, it would explain his notorious self-satisfaction until the day he died.
Was the British people’s adulation heaped upon his funeral cortege the greatest irony of all time? A country’s national mourning for the one man who single-handedly had destroyed their empire.
Final Destruction of the British Empire
Churchill had also bankrupted their country, turned the U.S. and USSR into superpowers, and then put into motion a sequence of governmental edicts that would result in Britain’s final destruction through a policy of non-European immigration and assimilation.
Could any conqueror have hoped to achieve more in just six years?
If Churchill was a super-agent, it is likely to have been a scam of such epic proportions that the controversy of the six million becomes a sideshow. Winston Churchill in his grave will still be grinning from ear to ear.
MICHAEL WALSH books include Witness to History and Adolf Hitler. My Last Testament. Let God Decide.
THANKS FOR SHARING WITH FRIENDS AND SOCIAL MEDIA
Share this:
Categories: World War II
Great Article by Mike!~~~~
The more you look at Ol Winston , the dirtier he Gets!—–At first I just bought the propaganda about him. He didn’t even perform alot of his “famous speeches” —some other dude did because Winny was smashed on booze alot. So the more research you do, the more you find the Ol Winny was a dirtbag on the take from the small hats!—He was also a complete TOOL for them. I knew his mother was ” American” but if she was a Jewess, then according to their laws of lineage, that makes Ol Winny a Small Hat!—No wonder they backed him financially!—-He also wore out at least 3 pairs of kneepads fellating Ol FDR, the Commie Cripple, over the course of those 16 visits. His administration was so full of Jews it read like the guest list at a Bar-mitzvah! —-So FDR was a Crypto Commie, who in turn wore out at least 3 pairs of kneepads on Stalin who he had a picture of on the inside of his closet door.
To cap it all off was the demise of the British Empire—run by the City of London , which in turn was run by the small hats. I believe the power switch from Britain to the US , from the Pound to the Dollar , was a long planned maneuver. So I wonder what Ol’ Winny would say about England now, where the Suicidal Twits are letting all these Invaders in and putting them up in hotels and giving them “Bennys”. Letting them form grooming gangs who rape and exploit their young girls? What happened to “we will fight them on the beaches”? Looks to me like Britian would have been much better off surrendering to Nazi Germany! —At least the Germans would never allow a muzzie invasion like the current traitors in their Gubmint. Its official! Screw Winnie the Crypto Jew. Traitor to his country and First Class Tool! However , his 2 volume set on his ancestor John Churchill –the Duke of Marlborough, one of England’s greatest Generals , is first class. Also his set of 6 books on WW2 is also pretty good if you read it with a grain of salt, knowing that he was a tool of the “Globalists”. A good writer . An even better Traitor.
LikeLike
I would say you overestimate Britain’s power heading into the second world war. WW1 had been ruinous to them, but like America now, declining but still not exhausted. The late 20s and early 30s saw the US impose on Britain the Washington Naval Treaty on ship size and numbers, theUs was passing them in naval power, like China is now to the US.
It was during this time the US had their infamous “War Plan Red” to attack the UK over WW1 debts, via Canada on land, and by sea to emerge as the dominate maritime power, under FDR they had updated it to use poison gas on Halifax NS, harbour in Canada. The uSA while not at its ww2 peak power, was strong enough to give the UK a hard time.
While Britains Dominions (Canada among them^^) were not consulted prior to entering the war, that was par for the course for the “mother” country as we were just expected to follow what they did. I think we flesed our muscles and declared war the day after Britain did vs the same day during ww1 LOL.
Most of these dominions had bountiful raw materials, but little in the way of manufacturing, partly due to our limited populations in Canada, Aus, NZ, S.A. and the hub and spoke trade of these dominions vs the home nation. India had population and the middle east had oil and the Suez canal, but little in the way of modern manufacturing. Even before it ramped up to @ 50% of world manufacturing at the end of WW2, the US was still far and away the world’s leader in heavy industry.
Was Churchill a double agent, totally!!! He could have been totally “Britain first” and left Poland to its devices, also he didnt attack the USSR for its half of Poland that it took. He could have shrewdly let Germany and the USSR fight till one was left, but he was funded by “the focus” and so ensured Germany had a two front war. This of course also made sure Britain was thrown in with the rest of europe, who in ww1 lost many of their kingdoms, now would lose much of their colonies and empires in ww2.
So he had to go hat in hand for lend lease which cost either dearly in territory in future bases or loans not paid off till the early 2000’s. It broke the empire, not in name, but in effect. Throw in FDR’s funding of the USSR via lend lease and the cold war was all by design.
LikeLiked by 1 person