MICHAEL WALSH FEATURE: TO WIN A WAR HE SOLD AN EMPIRE: Britain in 1939 still had a vast world empire. It also had powerful commonwealth allies.

It is strange that, throughout the war, Winston Churchill never consulted with his counterparts. They were from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, India, or Canada. He did not collaborate with them either.

These powerful British Empire nations made up an integral part of the British Empire.

Unlike the neutral United States, these nations had declared war on National Socialist Europe. Churchill never involved these partners in consultation about the direction of the war with Germany.

Their geographical diversity and access to raw materials suggest strategic advantages. Their manufacturing potential and trade connections are notable. The distance from Europe implies that, economically, they would make far better partners than did the United States. 

There would be little need for Lend Lease agreements. With interest, the British people would pay back to the United States for generations to come.

Why did Winston Churchill, who had the powers of a dictator, personally approach the British Empire’s only competitor? Why did he go cap in hand to them? He was electorally unaccountable. This country was not at war with Germany? Was the British Empire an irrelevancy to him?

Was it Churchill’s intention to broker a deal that would dismantle and transfer the British Empire to American power? If so, he could hardly have been more successful. He was, as we know, half American.

Did Winston Churchill have a secret agenda? Did he aim to remove German competition? Was there a simultaneous effort to reduce potential danger from the USSR? This situation was financed by Wall Street’s bankers.

If so, then he achieved far more for the USSR than did Josef Stalin, V. I. Lenin and Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) combined. They could have named Red Square after him.

As Prime Minister, was he financed by Jewish rings? Was he hand in glove with the better-known agents such as Kim Philby and the Soviet Spy Ring?

Winston Churchill became Britain’s unelected prime minister in 1940. One of his first acts was to halt all intelligence surveillance on Soviet suspects.

This led to the wholesale infiltration of MI5 and MI6 by the Kremlin throughout the 1940s.

Was it a coincidence? At this time, Britain’s head of MI6/SIS in the Iberian Peninsula was the notorious British-Soviet spy, Kim Philby.

Everything that Winston Churchill undertook worked to the detriment of Britain and its Empire. Every strategy he adopted benefited the Soviet Union and the all-powerful Jewish mafia controlling American politics? In Israel, a forest was named in Winston Churchill’s honour.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is a duck. People believe Winston Churchill succeeded beyond his wildest dreams.

He transferred the British Empire to its rival power. Between 64 and 71 years of age, that one man achieved a remarkable feat. He destroyed an empire so vast that the sun never set on it.

He created an all-powerful United States. He consolidated and extended the powers of the Soviet Union. He reduced to rubble the National Socialist system. This system could challenge the British Empire, the Soviet Union, and the United States as superpowers.

This may go some way to explain why Churchill expressed no regrets over the carnage of World War II. Why would he regret having so successfully accomplished all he had set out to achieve?

The appalling misery heaped upon mankind was profound. It would have been perfectly natural for any government leader to express remorse, regardless of political persuasion.

The six-nation National Socialist heads of state constantly lamented the suffering caused by the war. Yet, Josef Stalin, Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt never lamented the loss of 50 million lives.

How strange an oversight? If Winston Churchill was a super-agent, it would make him the most successful in world history. This would explain his notorious self-satisfaction until the day he died.

Was the British people’s adulation heaped upon his funeral cortege the greatest irony of all time? A country’s national mourning for the one man who single-handedly destroyed their empire.

Churchill had also bankrupted their country, turned the U.S. and USSR into superpowers, and then initiated a series of governmental edicts.

These edicts would lead to Britain’s final destruction through a policy of non-European immigration and assimilation. Could any conqueror have hoped to achieve more in just six years?

THE EUROPEAN AND ENGLISH JOURNAL. In terms of personal success, there has been no career more fortunate than that of Winston Churchill. In terms of human suffering to millions of people and the destruction of the noble edifice of mankind, there has been no career more disastrous.’ –– The European and English Journal.

If Churchill was a super-agent, the scam is likely to have been of epic proportions. This means the controversy of the six million becomes a sideshow. Winston Churchill, in his grave, will still be grinning from ear to ear. You can share this story on social media:

TELL US WHAT YOU THINK.

Mike Walsh books

in English and German

https://derschelm.com/andere-buecher/buecher-von-michael-walsh