Unarguably, the most popular statesman in the world, support for Russian President Vladimir Putin, in Russia and much of the rest of the world, is on a par with support for Adolf Hitler.  

Putin’s support base is the patriotic conservative right church.  In the opposing camp, the liberal-left, who describe the Russian leader as ‘Putler’. 

The liberal pro-Jewish mainstream daily vilifies Putin.  What did Josef Goebbels say?  ‘If you wake in the morning and you have not been pilloried by the Press, you have not been active the day before.’

Personally, I don’t have a dilemma with Putin.  Most of what he does might have been lifted straight out of the Reich’s rule book. 

He has stood up to the U.S., avoided the Rothschild banks, and rejected and replaced financial institutions like the IMF and the ECB. 

He has banned in Russia most of what we want to see banned in the West, such as GM foods, etc.  Restored Russian pride, prosperity and security, hounded corruption, and the oligarchs. The list of ‘Good Putin’ points would fill a book.

True, Putin has banned historical revisionism, as have many Western countries.   Pragmatism:  Both Russia and the West have much of their dark past to cover up. 

This censorship is to protect their past sins and society from the consequences of discovering that Hitler was a saint rather than a sinner. 

There are a hard-line few who hate or distrust Putin because he doesn’t goose-step across Red Square, sieg-heiling the Führer.  This is not going to happen.  Whether we like it or not, many (though not all) Russians still respect Stalin. 

Is there anything strange in that?   In Britain, Churchill, the half-Jew and guilty of as many crimes as Stalin, was voted the ‘Greatest Englishman Ever’. 

In the U.S., his vile henchman, who assisted in butchering Europe, F.D.R. Roosevelt (and Eisenhower) is revered, as is Stalin in Russia.  Those who cast stones come to mind.  Putin has condemned Bolshevism; have Western leaders done so?  No.

Putin is castigated by some for ‘working with Israel; you mean Hitler didn’t?  Hitler was not anti-Jewish per se; many lived, worked, and served in the Reich’s armed forces. 

Hitler was anti-Talmudic.  There is a difference.  In Hitler’s Germany, there were laws against incitement and many laws, seen by some as unjust, to protect the NSDAP Reich. 

In the 1920s and 1930s, the fear of Bolshevism gave the German people sleepless nights.  Imagine the alarm when the Reich signed the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, which gifted Poland and the Baltic States to arch-enemy Bolshevik Moscow.

This choice was Hitler’s worst nightmare.  Being a statesman and having to deal with realities rather than dreams, Hitler had little choice but the hard choice. 

Finally, a little sanguine maturity, please.  If you value and respect your opinion, and defend your right to express it, then extend the same freedom to others, or join the Bolsheviks.  You can share this story on social media: TELL US WHAT YOU THINK

WITNESS TO HISTORY Mike Walsh FORBIDDEN HISTORY: The bestselling epic of the Third Reich 1918-1959. ‘Of all the innumerable written source materials I have read during the last 70 years concerning Adolf Hitler, Witness to History is the most compelling, realistic overview of the Third Reich in print because its events are told by those who made them.’ ~ Marc Roland. https://barnesreview.org/product/witness-to-history-the-reich-legend-uncensored/