BRACE yourself. What’s being quietly drafted behind the scenes in Brussels could soon be inside your phone, your car, your laptop, and your child’s tablet.

The fact that these recommendations have made it as far as an official EU report is disturbing for many. Read on to find out what’s being suggested and how it will affect us all. 

Europe’s Secret War: Privacy by Design? Or Surveillance by Default?

The EU High-Level Group on Access to Data for Effective Law Enforcement, an unelected committee spun up by the European Commission with all the transparency of an MI6 tea party, has just published a list of 42 recommendations that reads like the instruction manual for a nightmare Orwellian surveillance state.

Chief among them? Recommendation 25, a proposal to force every digital device sold in Europe, including your phone, to come pre-installed with law enforcement access. This means it will be sold with a ‘virtual switch’ that police can activate to access your phone. Privacy, it seems, is now non-negotiable.

Not far behind is Recommendation 33, which would allow the EU to punish messaging services that don’t play ball. What starts as a policy paper may well end with a blacklist.

These recommendations aren’t law – yet – but the machinery is turning. And if they pass, your right to private digital life could vanish in the name of ‘public safety.’

Privacy? What privacy? For a continent that claims to pride itself on rights, the EU is getting surprisingly cozy with the language of control. 

A 124-page policy slab has landed from Brussels – the Recommendations of the High-Level Group on Access to Data for Effective Law Enforcement. You can read for yourself, it’s all there. And it’s not pretty.

‘Lawful Access by Design’: The Trojan Horse of Trust

The phrase ‘lawful access by design’ crops up 27 times in the recommendations. Sounds harmless. Maybe even progressive. But let’s call it what it is: a gentle-sounding euphemism for pre-installed backdoors. The HLG wants all digital devices – yes, your phone, tablet, and smart fridge – to be built with access points for law enforcement.

They promise it won’t weaken encryption. They say privacy and cybersecurity will remain intact. That only authorised agents, with warrants in hand, will peek inside. So, no need to worry. Only the eyes of the state will see into your phone. Anyone fancy going off-grid?

Beyond the idea of your phone being built so the state can look into your personal life, every expert worth their salt agrees: you can’t break encryption for the ‘good guys’ without leaving it vulnerable to the bad ones.

Encryption doesn’t bend. It breaks. And once it breaks, it breaks for everyone – activists, journalists, abused partners, and yes, even the bored bloke trying to keep his WhatsApp chats private.

The EU’s own data watchdogs have warned them. The privacy NGOs have raised the alarm. The technical community has written entire books on this. But still, the idea lurches forward.

Why? Because surveillance sells. And somewhere in the background, behind the legislation and the LEON working groups, are the vendors with shiny boxes and multi-million-euro contracts, ready to supply the tools that make the impossible ‘possible.’

From Targeted Warrants to Blanket Assumptions. The High-Level Group claims to be tackling serious crime, organised gangs, and terrorism.

And no sane person is against that. But read between the lines and you’ll find much more than kidnappers and cartel bosses. Recommendation 27 calls for all service providers – over-the-top apps, connected cars, satellite messengers – to store identifying data, just in case it’s needed later. Recommendation 33 talks about ‘sanctions’ against messaging platforms that don’t cooperate.

You don’t have to squint too hard to see where this all leads. Data hoarded ‘just in case.’ Platforms pressured to comply ‘or else.’ Access is demanded not because a suspect has been identified, but because one might exist in the future.

It’s a model that echoes more Beijing than Brussels. And if you’re wondering who exactly is behind this push, good luck.

When German MEP Patrick Breyer asked for the names of those involved in the High-Level Group’s meetings, the Commission refused.

They were happy to publish 42 recommendations that could dismantle encryption across an entire continent. Just not the names of the people who wrote them. That’s transparency in 2025. Orwell would be giddy.

What Happens Next? To be fair, these are just recommendations. They’re not the law. Not yet. But let’s not be naïve. This is how it starts.

Soft proposals. Gradual nudges. The window widens. By the time the real legislation comes, the room has already been cleared of outrage. People are no longer shocked. They comply.

The Real Crime? Silence. Europe talks a big game on digital rights. It lectures the world on privacy. It rolled out GDPR and wore it like a badge of honour. But this new push – this quiet war on encryption – threatens to gut those very values.

It’s not about choosing between privacy and security. It’s about refusing to pretend you can have both when you build in surveillance by default.

The people of Europe didn’t ask for this. Most don’t even know it’s happening. But if the Commission presses ahead, your phone won’t need to be hacked. It will come pre-compromised – approved, certified, and perfectly legal. And you’ll never know who’s listening.

This news is not being reported by most mainstream media, and that’s exactly what the creators of the report would want. So, share it, talk about it, and comment below. TELL US WHAT YOU THINK

PLEASE SHARE OUR PUBLIC INFORMATION STORIES

RETRIBUTION is A Liverpool-based city-vigilante thriller, more gripping than Death Wish by Michael Walsh award-winning novelist. ‘Retribution is the greatest movie never made’ ~ William Housman. ‘An excellent thriller written in the tense style of a John Le Carre spymaster novel’ ~ Brian Smyth. CLICK PIC OR LINK TO SEE BOOK

https://michaelwalshbooks.wordpress.com/