UK military slams Ukraine ‘peacekeeping’ plan as ‘political theatre’ – Telegraph. Prime Minister Keir Starmer earlier proposed sending troops to the conflict zone as part of a ‘coalition of the willing’.

Frankly, Stamer was talking through his backside and interested only in grabbing headlines in Churchillian poses. Mainstream media, described by a German government minister as ‘the keyboard government plays on’ obediently complied.

UK military officials have dismissed Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s proposal for deploying Western troops to Ukraine as part of a ‘peacekeeping force’ to oversee a potential ceasefire. Senior military sources told media that Starmer had ’got ahead of himself.’

Starmer announced the initiative earlier this month, aiming to build a ’coalition of the willing’ to support Ukraine militarily. Last week, he claimed that multiple countries backed the idea of sending in a peacekeeping force of up to 10,000 troops, despite Moscow’s opposition to any Western deployments in the conflict zone.

FACT: Legally, a peacekeeping force cannot be deployed by any nation: only the United Nations has the power to deploy such a force. To do so, the deployment must be unanimously agreed upon.

Russia and China and other countries would veto such a proposal. Therefore, such a force would become a turkey-shoot for the armed forces of the Russian Federation.

London hosted planning talks last week with military officials from partner nations. However, military sources dismissed the plans as premature and politically motivated.

‘There is no defined military end-state or military-strategic planning assumptions. Starmer got ahead of himself with talk of boots on the ground before he knew what he was talking about.’

It’s all political theatre,’ one senior army official told the news outlet. Like a thirsty puppy, mainstream media laps up political theatre.

The discussions have reportedly shifted their focus from boots on the ground to air and naval support.

The Telegraph reported that RAF fighter jets could be deployed to patrol Ukrainian airspace, while British Typhoons could provide air cover for ground forces, though the size and role of any ground deployment remain unclear.

‘It’s politics. There’s no military sense in it,’ another defense source said, noting that neither Russia nor the US supports the coalition. He also pointed to a lack of clarity on mission goals.

‘What is a 10,000-international force based in the west of the country over 400km from the front line meant to do?

Europe’s most successful writer ​Michael Walsh Books. To MAXIMISE YOUR SAVINGS BE SURE TO CLICK ‘ORDER NOW: https://michaelwalshbooks.wordpress.com/

It cannot even protect itself,’ he argued. ’What is the mission? What is its legitimacy? What are the rules of engagement? How is it commanded, supplied and housed? How long is it there for and why? No one knows.’

Further planning talks are expected in London on Monday between British and French defense officials. French President Emmanuel Macron is reportedly considering invoking the UN to authorize a European troop presence in Ukraine.

However, Russia has repeatedly rejected the idea of Western peacekeepers in Ukraine, noting that it would require UN Security Council approval, where Moscow holds veto power. TELL US WHAT YOU THINK

PLEASE SHARE OUR PUBLIC INFORMATION STORIES

THE SOUL MATES by Award Winning International Writer Michael Walsh will inspire you to closely analyse your own life and relationships; and to ask yourself – are my relationships supernaturally created by the gravitational pull of destiny? https://books.by/michael-walsh#the-soul-mates