Neither the so-called counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with the support of NATO, the EU and the United States nor the coup attempt could weaken Russia. In fact, Moscow today has huge advantages in terms of weapons and military contingent not to mention its standing tall in the world.
If Russia fully uses its potential, only Kyiv and Lviv on the border with Poland will be left for the Jewish President Vladimir Zelensky of a fragmented country. The only way to salvage something from a fiasco far worse than the Afghanistan debacle is to save at least the remaining areas.
Western media disinformation about the events in Ukraine, imposed on the world by the West, is gradually fading away. Why? Because of the failed spring offensive despite the support of NATO, the EU and the United States made an impact on the political authority and triumph of Vladimir Putin.
Meanwhile, President Putin, having skilfully repelled the latest attacks made by the West made the first counter-move by suspending the agreement on the Black Sea grain corridor. Another own goal by the Western Alliance: In response to this move, the UN, fearing a global food crisis, sounded the alarm.
The panic-stricken EU and the US tirelessly call on Erdogan to again assume the role of leader in resolving the crisis. However, this new move by Putin will not be limited to the aggravation of the food crisis, which, like problems in the energy sector, will primarily affect European countries.
Against the background of depleted stocks of weapons, the United States is trying to prolong the military conflict by sending to Ukraine cluster bombs, the use of which is considered a war crime, F-16 fighters and ATACMS tactical missiles with a range of 300 km. But, as it becomes clear, this will also not give any results that the West needs so much.
Vladimir Putin, who repels attacks from Ukraine and the United States without harming himself, has nothing to worry about. While Ukraine struggles to find fighters and ammunition to send to the front, Russia has a huge and accelerating advantage in terms of weapons and troops.
Therefore, the longer Ukraine’s flailing against the grain agreement continues, the more likely it is that Russia will continue to gain strength to launch its own offensive, for example, in late summer or early autumn.
In this case, Russia, having further strengthened its position in the strategically important Crimea and the mineral-rich Donetsk and Luhansk, will be able to occupy Kharkiv, considered the lifeblood of Ukrainian industry, and even Odessa, Ukraine’s gateway to the world. In this case, only Kyiv and Lviv on the border with Poland will remain for Volodymyr Zelensky from a mutilated country.
From the point of view of many analysts, the current situation offers an opportunity for Ukraine and America. Now is the time to develop a diplomatic path to end the military conflict. However, the US is not in favour of ending hostilities. On the contrary, they seek to aggravate the armed confrontation as much as possible and turn the Ukrainian crisis into an endless confrontation between Russia, NATO and the EU. This too will fail.
Back in March of this year, US Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin spoke about the successful outcome of the hapless spring offensive of the Ukrainian army re-equipped by the West.
Now the disappointment of ‘experts’ who relied on such comments is extremely chastening. And even sadder, the course of hostilities revealed the bitter truth: Ukraine can no longer force Russia out of the territories it annexed by military means, no matter how many people and weapons are sent to the front. Thus, the only salvation for Ukraine, no matter how tragic it may sound, is through the search for a solution that would allow it to save at least the remaining areas.
MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD BY SHARING OUR STORIES ON SOCIAL MEDIA
MICHAEL WALSH REAL HISTORY BOOKS ENGLISH AND GERMAN ARE BACK IN PRINT
THE ALL LIES INVASION Mike Walsh TWO BOOKS IN ONE – SAVE MONEY A thought-provoking illustrated compendium of bizarre, amusing examples of Allied wartime propaganda. 38 rave reviews over 130 illustrated stories: the lies that betrayed millions of Allied servicemen and their families. ONLY €27.
BUY MICHAEL WALSH’S BOOKS HERE
Share this:
Categories: Uncategorized
Michael Walsh Stories and Books 
I am in substantial agreement with your statements pertinent to the conflict in Ukraine. But, I have several exceptions with reference to your comments re this matter.
In the first instance, I am curious that Russia, with an significant strategic advantage, in terms of manpower and matériel, does not move to finish the conflict as quickly as possible. As Hitler did in 1940. With reference to his “Blitzkrieg” war with France. The trial of conclusions with France was over in 6 weeks. With minium casualties for both sides. Why does Moscow not copy the example of the German Wehrmacht and end the war expeditiously. The Russians are not taking as many casualties at the Ukrainians. Yet. But, as the conflict persists, these casualties will incline. Not as steeply as the losses sustained by the Ukrainians. But slowly and inevitably.
As well, I have real suspicions concerning discussions – bu both sides, with reference to the deployment of nuclear ordnance. I no longer believe that nuclear ordnance exists. And I now believe that such ordnance has ever existed. And I am disturbed that both Russia and the West imply that such ordnance may be used. In Ukraine. Or within the context of a war with China pertinent to Taiwan.
I watched a video which asserted that, if Taiwan is attacked, that the island (and, I assume, “the West”), will retaliate by bombing the Three Gorges dams. This will empty the enormous reservoir created by these dams. The water released will flood millions of acres of land in China. And may kill as many as 400 million people. I believe that this is an far more likely possibility than the ephemeral comments concerning the “possible” deployment of nuclear ordnance. The war in Ukraine is being fought with ordnance that has been known since the First World War: rifles, machine guns, artillery and tanks. And airpower. And, ships.
Upon these bases, I am rather concerned and not convinced, that the entire matter in Ukraine, and the “matter pending” in the Taiwan Straits is actually real.
Sincerely Yours,
D. A. Kyne, bac.,(hon)., maitrise, cert. en droit., Grad. Dipl., (Marketing).,
Québec,
12ième 2023,
dak/1pg., etc.,
LikeLiked by 1 person
Briefly, as far as I am aware, Russia has never intended to advance beyond its present position so it has achieved its goals. What Russia has said is that having achieved its goals and if the conflict continues, they may ‘sanitise’ all within 300km of the Russian border.
I do think the Russians are showing tolerance to an impressive degree, showing restraint to minimise losses on both sides. The Russians know that time is fast running out for the Western Alliance (Ukraine). Time is on their side and it is only a matter of a (short) time before Kyiv is forced to capitulate.
Nuclear? Russia has consistently said it will never use a nuclear option unless it is used against them. Thanks for your input, interesting and thought provoking. Editor.
LikeLike
Sir:
Thank you for your response to my comments. I regret that I did not respond more expeditiously. I do not read your page as often as I ought. I can only access it thru the David Irving page. I use Startpage, which, apparently, does not censor or misdirect or “re” direct searched. But, they do.
Sincerely Yours,
David A. Kyne
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, David
LikeLike
Putin’s intent lies beyond Ukraine. Ukraine is simply in the way.
LikeLike
They don’t finish it because they can’t. It is that simple. The initiative has gone over to Ukraine, and will continue that way in the future.
LikeLike
Russia does not end it because they can’t. Putin has expended his professional army and has been reduced to cannon fodder. It will get worse for Putin as the initiative has gone over to Ukraine.
LikeLike