A 19-year-old woman has filed a lawsuit against pharmaceutical giant Merck, alleging that the company misled the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), legislators, doctors and moms about the safety and efficacy of its Gardasil vaccine and caused her permanent injuries.

According to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), more than 64,000 reports of adverse events have been reported after people received the Gardasil vaccine. Only one percent of vaccine injuries are reported. Why mandate this vaccine?

The national law firm of Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman filed a lawsuit on August 19 against pharmaceutical giant, Merck, on behalf of a 19-year old woman who is alleging the company misled the FDA, legislators, doctors and moms about the safety and efficacy of its Gardasil vaccine.

According to Children’s Health Defense, ‘The lawsuit asserts Merck purposely downplayed the risk of Gardasil’s ingredients, including a proprietary aluminium compound (a potent neurotoxin) and secret and potentially hazardous DNA particles.’ The plaintiff’s name is Julia Balasco, and she is alleging that she suffered and continues to suffer ‘severe and permanent physical injuries such as an autoimmune disease known as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) after receiving multiple injections of the human papillomavirus (HPV) Gardasil vaccine.’

Attorneys Bijan Esfandiari, Nicole K. H. Maldonado, Michael L. Baum, co-counsel Robert F. Kennedy, Jr and local counsel Christopher E. Hultquist of Hultquist Law in Providence, filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island on behalf of Ms. Balasco, who alleges her vaccine injuries were so severe and debilitating, she was physically unable to attend most of high school.

Apparently, Merck failed to properly test Gardasil before the HPV vaccine was fast-tracked and then administered to millions of young girls and boys throughout the world. Furthermore, Merck knew or had reason to know that its vaccine was not even effective but did not warm the medical community or the public. ‘The company wrongfully concealed information and further made false statements concerning the safety and efficacy of Gardasil.’

This is important because it’s not an isolated incident. Injuries as a result of HPV vaccination regularly occur and include deaths. The HPV vaccine has constantly come under the scrutiny of published peer-reviewed science by a number of independent researchers.

For example, a study  published in Clinical Rheumatology exposes how the vaccine manufacturers used phoney placebos in clinical trials to conceal a wide range of devastating risks associated with HPV vaccines. Instead of using genuine inert placebos and comparing health impacts over a number of years, as is required for most new drug approvals, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline spiked their placebos with a neurotoxic aluminium adjuvant and cut observation periods to a matter of months.

There are multiple examples of HPV vaccine injuries, which is why Japan, for example, stopped recommending it. ’Sacrificial Virgins’ is one of the multiple films to tackle an issue that continues to largely go unacknowledged and it provides more examples.

Jennifer Robi is a 24-year-old former athlete and scholar who has been confined to a wheelchair since receiving her third Gardasil vaccines at age sixteen. She suffers continual uncontrolled neuro/muscular contractions (jerking) and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and many other symptoms of systemic autoimmune dysregulation.

A new study published in The Royal Society of Medicine is one of multiple studies over the years that have emerged questioning the efficacy of the HPV vaccine.

The researchers conducted an appraisal of published phase 2 and 3 efficacy trials in relation to the prevention of cervical cancer and their analysis showed ‘the trials themselves generated significant uncertainties undermining claims of efficacy’ in the data they used.

The researchers emphasized that ‘it is still uncertain whether human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination prevents cervical cancer as trials were not designed to detect this outcome, which takes decades to develop.’  The researchers point out that the trials used to test the vaccine may have ‘overestimated’ the efficacy of the vaccine. The authors point out that it was even questionable whether or not the vaccine prevents pre-cancerous lesions, let alone cancer.

n fact, there is evidence suggesting that cervical cancer rates have increased since the introduction of the vaccine, and we already know that if a woman has been exposed to an HPV infection before the vaccine, their chances of developing cancer from the vaccine increase by nearly 50 percent.

Many people claim that the amount of aluminium we take in from other sources is greater than the aluminium in vaccines, but fail to realize that the aluminium we take into our body from vaccines may not exit our body.

Professor Christopher Shaw from the University of British Columbia in Canada explains that injected aluminium doesn’t come into the same methods of excretion as the aluminium we take in from food, for example. When we inject aluminium, it stays in the body, it may cross the blood-brain barrier, enter into cells and various organs in the body. Source